Grok API

Claude vs Grok: which is better?

Updated:

A comparison of the flagship text models Claude Opus 5 and Grok 4.6 across intelligence, API price, context window, and output speed.

Claude and Grok by the numbers

The gap on the composite Intelligence Index is small: 63 against 61. For developers, the clearest differences are token price and context size.

Intelligence Index

Claude Opus 563
Grok 4.661

API price

input / output per 1M tokens

Grok 4.6
$2 / $6
Claude Opus 5
$5 / $25

Context

Claude Opus 51M
Grok 4.6500K

Output speed

output tokens per second

Grok 4.658.3
Claude Opus 552.7

Claude vs Grok: flagship model comparison

CriterionClaude Opus 5Grok 4.6Takeaway
Intelligence Index63 in max mode.61 in high mode.Claude Opus 5 leads the ranking; Grok 4.6 trails by 2 points.
API price$5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens from Anthropic.$2 input and $6 output per 1M tokens from xAI.Grok 4.6 is 2.5× cheaper on input and roughly 4× cheaper on output.
Context1M tokens.500K tokens.Claude Opus 5 fits twice as much text in one request.
Output speed52.7 tokens per second.58.3 tokens per second.Grok 4.6 responds slightly faster, which shows in interactive use.
ReasoningAdaptive thinking with effort levels up to max.Configurable reasoning effort.Both support complex multi-step work.

Which one to choose

Hard reasoning and long context — Claude Opus 5

The top Intelligence Index score and a 1M-token window help when one request must contain a large repository, a document set, or a long conversation history.

Volume and cost — Grok 4.6

For a 2-point Intelligence Index difference, Grok 4.6 officially costs $2 per 1M input and $6 per 1M output tokens. On high-volume workloads that gap dominates the bill.

Production — test both

One benchmark cannot decide every project. Quality on your data, context length, speed, and completed-task cost all matter.

Grok API Dev · One interface · free model choice

Choose the model for the task

Grok API Dev brings Grok, Claude, GPT, and other popular models into one interface. One key and one balance — switch between them per workload without changing your SDK.

−50%
on every model
One interface for different models
GrokClaudeGPT

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude smarter than Grok?

On the Artificial Analysis composite Intelligence Index, Claude Opus 5 scores 63 in max mode and Grok 4.6 scores 61 in high mode. The gap is small and the order can flip on a specific task, so decide from measurements on your own data.

Which is cheaper, Claude or Grok?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper: $2 per 1M input and $6 per 1M output tokens against $5 and $25 for Claude Opus 5. Output tokens differ by roughly 4×, so long answers and high-volume workloads save the most.

Which model has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 5 has a 1M-token context window; Grok 4.6 has 500K. Claude fits twice as much text in one request, which matters for large codebases and document sets.

Which is better for coding, Claude or Grok?

Both target complex code and agentic tool calling. Claude Opus 5 leads on long multi-step tasks and large context; Grok 4.6 is the better economic fit where cost and request volume dominate. The practical approach is to run both on your own tasks.

Can I use Claude and Grok through one API?

Yes. Grok API Dev serves Grok, Claude, GPT, and other models through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, one API key, and a shared balance. Switching models means changing the model value in the request.